Let's learn a little about neuroscience

Sometimes so very hard.... This last June started a huge change in how I see the world of neuroscience. Not just because of the craniofacial world of 11 years and chiari world of four years either. The month of June we had to learn about epilepsy, possible hydrocephalus, encephalomalacia and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. All within weeks apart. The encephalomalacia was due to the pressure being too high in my son's head prior to his last craniofacial surgery. I don't blame anyone, it is what it is..... We didn't know the pressure was so bad till the day of surgery.... Now, I was a neuro mom even before my son was born due to my daughter's medical but nothing like I am now. I know way more than I wish I ever had to.... I never thought I would learn so much in the neuro world..... Let alone be on stuff like Medscape or the NIH to learn even more!

Till recently, I had wanted to blame my son's epilepsy on the ADEM, and hope that the encephalomalacia had no involvement with anything. I was dead wrong.....

Oh yeah, the ADEM added to it but it wasn't the culprit for the seizures like we hoped.

As to what else the encephalomalacia will do in time, it's honestly hard to say. I've been doing some more digging into TBI stuff. This video was amazing!

Now particularly I have been doing research on the left middle frontal lobe gyrus and the right temporal pole region. Now the encephalomalacia affects the white matter. What is the white brain matter? White matter refers to areas of the central nervous system (CNS) that are mainly made up of myelinated axons, also called tracts. Long thought to be passive tissue, white matter affects learning and brain functions, modulating the distribution of action potentials, acting as a relay and coordinating communication between different brain regions. In other words, it's like power lines. Without those lines working properly, you don't get electricity like you should. Or like a cell phone, without good service your calls break up, if they work at all and your data is really slow if working at all. The main thing it affects is cognitive function, executive function, learning and memory. Now how exactly depends on the areas of damage/loss. My son is likely, if not already to have at least some issues with all of this. With issues mainly at school, sometimes home, only time will tell us if encephalomalasia or something else is triggering it all. How long or to what extent is unknown at this point. Now, he's been off of steroids totally now since Thanksgiving day so steroids now should not be affecting much if anything.

As to the seizures:

credit

Seizures is one way that literal electrical signals in the brain don't work properly. It's like a power surge to a single area and or to multiple areas of the brain. Depends on the seizure, where, how it starts and if it spreads out during it. Sometimes you can see a cause on an MRI and sometimes not. If your first seizure occurred at the time of an injury or infection in the brain, then you are more likely to develop epilepsy. Often, more seizures don’t occur until weeks or months after the initial injury or infection. My son's are most often complex partial (focal) seizures. We've had two EEG's catch seizures already. One caught one from the left side encephalomalacia area and the other from the right side encephalomalacia. Most I've seen have been from the left side due to how he stares right with most when he has them. His first one was the left side, we know because he was staring right. Looking back at the first one, I saw his left arm stiffen up and a little nystagmus going with the seizure. I remember riding up with him in the EMS for the first one. It was surreal..... Anytime now I hear our county ambulance sirens, I feel anxiety and sometimes get choked up... Almost feels sorta like PTSD or something....

For details, here's his last three EEG's. Two were inpatient and the most recent outpatient one before we saw neurology.

6-1-18 Focal seizure localized to the left frontal region with associated jerking of the right arm with head turned to right.

6-14-18 A focal seizure was captured at the onset of this recording from the right temporal region. Post-ictal right hemispheric slowing was noted after this, most prominent in the right temporocentral region. In addition, occasional left frontotemporal sharp waves were noted throughout the recording. (This was during the stay with ADEM)

9-26-18 Intermittent focal slowing was noted in the right temporal region suggestive of white matter injury in this region. (No seizure during this BUT it does confirm the encephalomalacia is a cause...)

So.... With that in mind, I did some digging.

The closest I had gotten in my research so far is this: The two pictures posted show on MRI but also in online sketches where the encephalomalacia is. The only things I have found on what could all be affected is this: Memory loss, if the frontal lobe is affected, mood swings, working memory  and executive function problems also in the event of the frontal lobe’s involvement. So could his behavior issues at school all be related to this? If it is then it's for the long haul, like it or not.

credit                                                                                credit

Now in particular I did find this on the left middle frontal gyrus. "findings confirmed that the LMFG takes active parts in word production, and suggested that it may serve as a temporal perceptual information storage space, supporting the hierarchical state feedback control model of word production." Hence it could also add to his speech language issues.

The right temporal pole involvement, I found this but also I did read here that with the temporal lobes of themselves that "When damage occurs to these areas of the brain, patients may experience disturbance of auditory sensation and perception, an inability to pay attention to what they see or hear, impaired ability to comprehend language, impaired factual and long term memory, emotional disturbance, and altered sexual behaviors. They may also have seizures, lose their sense of humor, and become obsessive." As to the temporal pole, several studies have shown that the temporal pole is an association cortex involved with multimodal analysis, especially in social and emotional processing.

I wanted more information. I want to know more. I want to know exactly how this all will affect my son. So, more research yesterday and today I did.

Here is where I'll probably lose many of you. Sorry, come into research with me.

via GIPHY

Come see how my brain works when I learn.

The Kindle book I've been reading about the frontal lobe, in particular with where my son's is affected says this "The left frontal area mediates the synactical, lexical, semantic, and temporal sequental aspects of speech." "The left frontal lobe is clearly dominant in this regard (expressive speech) as is also demonstrated in functional imaging." and "If the left frontal lobe is injured, cognitive and expressive functions tend to become suppressed and inhibited - a function not only of the injury but right frontal suppressive influences." I have also read elsewhere how it is affected through executive function and other behavioral aspects, similar to those affected by ADHD and similar.

The other Kindle book I have about the temporal lobes said this "Right temporal injuries can disrupt the ability to remember musical tunes or to create musical imagery." Yet my son can imaginary play a trumpet and can keep the beat to music. It does not appear that his damage has affected that area of the temporal lobe but moreso the area around where the frontal and temporal meet. Of the research I've seen it's more likely that his ability to auditory process words could be affected, not so much seeing or pronouncing.

While researching in particular, the Brodmann areas and seeing them on a map vs my son's MRI, I was able to better see where exactly the right temporal pole was on his brain but also the left middle front gyrus.

credit

You might want to use that image for a little reference for the next little bit. 10 is the front, 17 is the back.

Left middle frontal gyrus

Through my researching however, it looks more like it's area 46 of the Brodmann brain map that's affected on the left side. Still the left middle frontal gyrus but less of area 8 & 9. Area 46 is the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a central role in sustaining attention and managing working memory, and has recently been shown to regulate self-control. It is one of the few cortical areas whose activity diminishes during REM sleep.

The high connectivity of this area within the frontal lobe as well as other parts of the brain means that damage can have a wide variety of effects. Lesions or damage impair short-term memory, cause difficulty inhibiting responses, impair the ability to judge the relevance of stimuli, and cause problems in organization.

In particular this site said the following about Brodmann area 46:

"Departing from the neuroimaging studies it is evident that BA46, as well as BA9/10,  is involved in memory, particularly working memory and memory control and organization. Because of the association of working memory with prefrontal activity, some clarification about working memory is important. It has been assumed that working memory is involved in a diversity of cognitive processes, including language comprehension, planning, reasoning, problem solving and even consciousness. It is important to emphasize that span tests (e.g., digit span) (working memory storage process) exhibit greater dependence on the posterior cortex, whereas delayed recognition performance (working memory rehearsal process) exhibits greater dependence on the prefrontal cortex. When information has to be manipulated, increased prefrontal activity is found. The manipulation-related processes ascribed to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are fundamentally extramnemonic in nature (that means, metamemory). Whereas they play a fundamental role in the exercise of executive control of working memory, they do not govern the storage per se of the information held in working memory. The participation of the left anterior middle frontal gyrus in language is also shared by other left prefrontal convexital areas; according to current knowledge of languages disturbances associated with brain pathology, other linguistic functions potentially related with BA46, such as verbal initiative and language pragmatics, have not been fully approached in fMRI studies. Two fMRI studies attract special attention: (1) “Willed acts” in the two response modalities studied (speaking a word, or lifting a finger) were associated with increased blood flow in BA46; (2) mirror neurons: a basic circuit underlying imitation learning including the inferior parietal lobule and the posterior part of the inferior frontal gyrus plus the adjacent premotor cortex (mirror neuron circuit) has been proposed. During pause, the middle frontal gyrus (area 46) plus those structures involved in motor preparation (dorsal premotor cortex, superior parietal lobule, rostral mesial areas) also become active."

Now, due to how close 46 is to a couple of others, I looked them up too. Here's what it said about areas 8 & 9:

"Without question, BA9/10 has a significant participation in memory, particularly memory encoding, memory retrieval, and working memory. Those studies relating BA10 with “event- and time-based prospective memory” and “intentional forgetting”, suggest the involvement of BA10 in controlling, and manipulating memory (metamemory). Hence, it could be argued that the middle frontal gyrus participates in an extensive memory circuit, and it has some fundamental role in organizing memory strategies and controlling memory. BA9/10 have also other evident executive functions, such as “executive control of behavior”, “inferential reasoning”, and “decision making”. Its participation in complex language processes may suggest the use of verbal strategies in executive processing; in these cases (e.g., syntactic processing, metaphor comprehension, generating sentences, etc), an extensive network is activated, involving diverse language related areas. Interestingly, BA10 seems to be involved in attending to sensory stimulation (e.g., response to baroreceptor stimulation, response to painful thermal stimuli, and joint attention). Two studies related the middle frontal gyrus with processing emotions. This involvement may be related to making decisions about emotional stimuli." Left side was highly remarked on the list for speech problems, as confirmed earlier. 

Since area 44 is close to 46 along with 9/10, here's what it said about that.

"From the traditional point of view, Broca's area corresponds to BA 44, but several contemporary authors also include BA 45.  It can be conjectured that in the future, the most anterior part of the insula could also be included in the Broca’s area, given its participation in the praxis of speech (motor speech programming). Different proposals have been presented to explain language disturbances in so-called Broca’s aphasia; different hypotheses have attempted to postulate a core BA44 function, including: binding the elements of the language, selecting information among competing sources, generating/extracting action meanings; sequencing motor/expressive elements; cognitive control mechanism for the syntactic processing of sentences; construction of higher parts of the syntactic tree in speech production; and verbal working memory.  Functional studies have further improved our understanding of BA44. Although the core BA44 function remain elusive, fluency and sequencing may potentially account for many of the functions in which BA44 participates. The suggestion that BA44 includes mirror neurons for expressive movements is particularly provocative and may enlighten the question of inner speech (e.g., internally generated language).  Functional studies have also contributed to further understand right BA44, which seemingly participates in perception and expression of prosodic and emotional information. From the perspective of the lesional model, unfortunately just few studies have analyzed the clinical disturbances associated with right BA44. Functional studies have also disclosed the participation of BA44 in a diversity of tasks that are difficult to interpret with our current understanding of the brain, such as pain anticipation, perception of tactile stimulation, motion after-effect, object manipulation, smelling familiar odors, and music enjoyment; in those cases, BA44 activation is just an additional element in a complex brain network; it may be suggested that some internal verbalization can account for BA44 involvement in these unexpected activities.  Its participation in working memory may also reflect the internal rehearsal of the information."

The final area I looked up was the BA45.

"Without question, the functions of BA45 are significantly coincidental with the functions of BA44,  supporting the proposal that they both, at least partially, correspond to a single system. Nonetheless, BA45 seems to be involved in relatively more complex verbal functions, for instance, processing of metaphors and reasoning processes. As observed with BA44, BA45 participate in a diversity of functions difficult to interpret with our current understanding of the brain (e.g., smelling of familiar odors) and probably reflecting some inner speech during the performance of those tasks. BA45 participation in working memory may also reflect the internal rehearsal of the information."

I believe though 45 is not affected, at least directly by the encephalomalacia. It's more likely to be 9,46 and or 44.

Right temporal pole

As to the right side, I have looked up more into that. Brodmann area 38 in particular. One part that it can affect is irony processing which is the way the mind can block some things out. Also identifying familiar voices. That site also said this. "Functional studies have disclosed the unexpected complexity of BA38 functions. Because of its location in the brain, it is understandable that BA38 participates in language processes, emotion, executive functions, and memory. Left BA38 is involved in diverse “high level” verbal functions (e.g., semantic processing, naming of items learned in early life, lexico-semantic ambiguity processing, etc.). Departing from the reported functional studies BA38 involvement in emotion seems evident (e.g., visual processing of emotional images, emotional attachment, response to threat/fearful stimulus, etc.). In some executive functions (e.g., moral judgment, inferential reasoning, etc) BA38 is also active. Diverse studies support BA38 contribution to multimodal memory retrieval. Additionally, it seems to contribute to some complex auditory processing; for instance, recognition of familiar voices (phonognosis), and response to averse auditory stimulation. Interestingly, traumatic head injury usually impacts the temporal pole, and it has been suggested that the difficulties to separate auditory “figure” (e.g., language) from background “noise” found in patients with head injury, is a result of BA38 damage."

Overall that site was quite helpful beyond what digging I had already been doing. However comparing my son's imaging to the maps I have been seeing along with what the radiology reports and docs noted where the encephalomalacia is, this all makes sense. This one has helped too along with Google Translate.

So if you kept up with all of that earlier or not, either way, research is what I've been doing, neuropsych with a QEEG is coming up next month for my son and hopefully answers. What he needs is neuropsychological testing and a special type of EEG called a Quantitative Electroencephalography. It will help us better know what is all going on inside his brain and how he is processing the world around him. It should also tell us how all the encephalomalacia has affected hum along with the epilepsy. We already know the epilepsy was caused from the encephalomalacia. This testing will also strongly help with his IEP meeting for public schools come spring.

What is a QEEG?

The QEEG is a special type of EEG that will help us better know exactly how his brain is functioning. A standard EEG is very good, but sometimes not detailed enough. The QEEG will be like having a Rand McNally map of his brain vs a sketch map of his brain.


What is Brain Mapping?

"Quantitative electroencephalography or qEEG is the process of measuring, recording and analyzing electrical activity in the brain and comparing it to normative or average values. This process is also called brain mapping, because brainwave data reveals a detailed picture of how your brain is functioning relative to these normative databases. LoRETA imaging is a newer, more advanced application of qEEG we employ to get help uncover the root causes of your symptoms. Brain mapping is just one of the many brain training tools we utilize at APEX Brain Centers.
How is qEEG Brain Mapping Used?

A qEEG brain map can show how each part of a brain functions under a variety of conditions. This precise measurement of brain waves reveals which areas of the brain are functioning optimally, and which areas can be improved. We use qEEG as a guide to determine the most efficient and effective way to train your brain to achieve your goals: better memory, increased focus and attention, decreased anxiety, and peak performance; among others." source

What is neuropsych testing?

"Neuropsychological evaluation is an assessment of how one’s brain functions, which indirectly yields information about the structural and functional integrity of your brain. The neuropsychological evaluation involves an interview and the administration of tests. The tests are typically pencil and paper type tests. Some tasks might be self-reports meaning that they are completed by the patient with assistance from a technician, but the majority of the tests require administration by a neuropsychologist or trained, skilled psychometrist.

Neuropsychological tests (unlike bedside cognitive and behavioral neurologic screens) are standardized, meaning that they are given in the same manner to all patients and scored in a similar manner time after time. An individual’s scores on tests are interpreted by comparing their score to that of healthy individuals of a similar demographic background (i.e., of similar age, education, gender, and/or ethnic background) and to expected levels of functioning. In this way, a neuropsychologist can determine whether one’s performance on any given task represents a strength or weakness. Although individual scores are important, the neuropsychologist looks at all of the data from the evaluation to determine a pattern of cognitive strengths and weaknesses and, in turn, to understand more about how the brain is functioning.

Neuropsychological tests evaluate functioning in a number of areas including: intelligence, executive functions (such as planning, abstraction, conceptualization), attention, memory, language, perception, sensorimotor functions, motivation, mood state and emotion, quality of life, and personality styles. The areas addressed in an individual’s evaluation are determined by the referral question (what the referring doctor and patient wants to know), patient’s complaints and symptoms, and observations made during interview and test administration." source


Let's see if my research has any backing. Some of it already has given how the first neuropsych appointment went recently. Much of what I had been digging up before today was confirmed by the neuropsychologist I met. Behavior, speech, processing mainly being affected by those two areas of encephalomalacia.

I need a shirt that says "Neuro mom? NAILED IT!" with a huge brain on the front of the shirt.

credit

So, right now that is where we are. The lesson in neuroscience you just read is just the tip of the iceberg.... I know so little but know so much more than your average Joe for sure.

The questions now is, what's next? Where do we go from here? What else is affected as a result of all of this? Did the lesions do long term issues? What of the encephalomalacia? What of the three long seizures he's had before? Longest timed one was 12 minutes. The first one ever I'd wager was easily 15 minutes, if not longer from the time it started to the time the paramedic finally stopped it. It took them a bit to get it under control. It gets dangerous after 5 minutes, which is why we have to go Diastat after 5 minutes... And watch his O2 levels. His lowest O2 I remember seeing after a seizure with meds was 66%.....
What results will show with his fine motor, gross motor and speech? His recent testing showed good progress in speech, some progress and regression with PT and stayed stagnant with OT.

Hopefully neuropsych testing and his QEEG can help with that. I almost fear the results though. We need those results to better help him, yet how much heartbreak will it carry? I'm sure there'll be some good in there too but I fear the "official" stoff sometimes. The stuff you do see some of, but overlook most days. The stuff that just says "He's behind a little" but is it really "little" or is it much more than that?

credit

credit

This journey brings triumph. This journey brings tears. This journey brings joy. This journey brings sorrow. This journey shows many blessings. This journey also shows some curses.

It is mine!

It is the journey in the world of neuroscience. It is also a journey in endocrinology, urology, and other specialties outside the realm of the brain.

I may talk about many topics on this blog but I'm a child of God first, a wife second and a mother third. Beyond that, lies the rest, including being a musician.

So let's see where this journey goes....

via GIPHY

~ Special Momma ~

The Homeless

Let's talk about this. Truly..... Locally there has been soooo much talk about the homeless along with panhandlers and the comments seen on social media about the homeless angers me and breaks my heart.... So, let's talk about it.

So what is the official definition of homeless? According to this,

A homeless individual is defined in section 330(h)(5)(A) as “an individual who lacks housing (without regard to whether the individual is a member of a family), including an individual whose primary residence during the night is a supervised public or private facility (e.g., shelters) that provides temporary living accommodations, and an individual who is a resident in transitional housing.” A homeless person is an individual without permanent housing who may live on the streets; stay in a shelter, mission, single room occupancy facilities, abandoned building or vehicle; or in any other unstable or non-permanent situation. [Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C., 254b)]

 An individual may be considered to be homeless if that person is “doubled up,” a term that refers to a situation where individuals are unable to maintain their housing situation and are forced to stay with a series of friends and/or extended family members. In addition, previously homeless individuals who are to be released from a prison or a hospital may be considered homeless if they do not have a stable housing situation to which they can return. A recognition of the instability of an individual’s living arrangements is critical to the definition of homelessness. (HRSA/Bureau of Primary Health Care, Program Assistance Letter 99-12, Health Care for the Homeless Principles of Practice)

Programs funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) use a different, more limited definition of homelessness [found in the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-22, Section 1003)].

    An individual who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence;
    An individual who has a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings, including a car, park, abandoned building, bus or train station, airport, or camping ground;
    An individual or family living in a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designated to provide temporary living arrangements (including hotels and motels paid for by Federal, State or local government programs for low-income individuals or by charitable organizations, congregate shelters, and transitional housing);
    An individual who resided in a shelter or place not meant for human habitation and who is exiting an institution where he or she temporarily resided;
    An individual or family who will imminently lose their housing [as evidenced by a court order resulting from an eviction action that notifies the individual or family that they must leave within 14 days, having a primary nighttime residence that is a room in a hotel or motel and where they lack the resources necessary to reside there for more than 14 days, or credible evidence indicating that the owner or renter of the housing will not allow the individual or family to stay for more than 14 days, and any oral statement from an individual or family seeking homeless assistance that is found to be credible shall be considered credible evidence for purposes of this clause]; has no subsequent residence identified; and lacks the resources or support networks needed to obtain other permanent housing; and
    Unaccompanied youth and homeless families with children and youth defined as homeless under other Federal statutes who have experienced a long-term period without living independently in permanent housing, have experienced persistent instability as measured by frequent moves over such period, and can be expected to continue in such status for an extended period of time because of chronic disabilities, chronic physical health or mental health conditions, substance addiction, histories of domestic violence or childhood abuse, the presence of a child or youth with a disability, or multiple barriers to employment.

Hence different agencies use different definitions of homelessness, which affect how various programs determine eligibility for individuals and families at the state and local level. Health centers use the HHS definition in providing services.

So let's talk about this.

"Two trends are largely responsible for the rise in homelessness over the past 20-25 years: a growing shortage of affordable rental housing and a simultaneous increase in poverty."

In the year 2009, one out of 50 children or 1.5 million children in United States of America will be homeless each year. There were an estimated 57,849 homeless veterans estimated in the United States during January 2013, or 12 percent of all homeless adults. Just under 8 percent of homeless U.S. veterans are female. Texas, California and Florida have the highest numbers of unaccompanied homeless youth under the age of 18, comprising 58% of the total homeless under 18 youth population. Homelessness affects men more than women. In the United States, about 60% of all homeless adults are men.

That's not all of it though. Causes of homelessness in the United States include lack of affordable housing, divorce, lawful eviction, negative cash flow, post traumatic stress disorder, foreclosure, fire, natural disasters (hurricane, earthquake, or flood), mental illness, physical disability, having no family or supportive relatives, substance abuse, lack of needed services, elimination of pensions and unemployment entitlements, no or inadequate income sources (such as Social Security, stock dividends, or annuity), poverty (no net worth), gambling, unemployment, and low-paying jobs. Homelessness in the United States affects many segments of the population, including families, children, domestic violence victims, ex-convicts, veterans, and the aged. Efforts to assist the homeless include federal legislation, non-profit efforts, increased access to healthcare services, supportive housing, and affordable housing.

Some facts to consider:

1. Increasingly, states are passing a personal bill of rights act calling for reasonable accommodation of the things inherently human and necessary. These rights include such things as

the right to sit

the right to eat in public and share food with others

the right to sleep

the right to seek help

the right to vote

the right to pray

the right to privacy

the right to feel safe

2. 65% of homeless seek nonprofit and government shelter; the other 35% remain unsheltered. These are options. When we mandate what a person must do, we create an unwarranted detention

3. 30% of people who are homeless are chronically homeless, meaning they were basically without shelter for 12 months out of 36. About 30% of the chronically homeless have mental health with about one-half reporting substance abuse problems. Of the remaining 70%, their homeless status may have only been for a few days.

4. 30% are 24 or younger and are subject to exploitation

5. 75% are single with 65% male

6. 44% performed paid work in the last month with one in five expecting their work to last at least three months. Only 2% panhandle

7. 25% of us will be disabled; 40% bankrupt by age 65

8. At any given time, there are about 2,200 homeless in Arkansas; 4,200 in Oklahoma. The states with the largest concentrations of homeless are CA, FL, TX and MS. On any given night 575,000 are homeless in the U.S., but in any given year the unduplicated count soars over 1.5 million.

9. Homelessness has been on the decline since 2006, but jumped last year with 2% more in shelters but 9% more living unsheltered, making the homeless increasingly visible.

There are many reasons why someone may end up homeless. Eviction or foreclosure, negative cash flow, no net worth to fall back on, no family or friends to rely on, PTSD, divorce, mental illness or substance abuse, no pension or expired unemployment benefits, gambling, rejection of social mores or finding societal living too complex, disability, no work; not enough hours; or low pay. fire or natural disaster, lack of affordable housing. Let's look at this that was published several years ago.

"Two trends are largely responsible for the rise in homelessness over the past 20-25 years: a growing shortage of affordable rental housing and a simultaneous increase in poverty. Below is an overview of current poverty and housing statistics, as well as additional factors contributing to homelessness. A list of resources for further study is also provided.

FORECLOSURE

Recently, foreclosures have increased the number of people who experience homelessness. The National Coalition for the Homeless released an entire report discussing the relationship between foreclosure and homelessness. The report found that there was a 32% jump in the number of foreclosures between April 2008 and April 2009. Since the start of the recession, six million jobs have been lost. In May 2009, the official unemployment rate was 9.4%. The National Low Income Housing Coalition estimates that 40 percent of families facing eviction due to foreclosure are renters and 7 million households living on very low incomes (31 - 50 percent of Area Median Income) are at risk of foreclosure.

POVERTY

Homelessness and poverty are inextricably linked. Poor people are frequently unable to pay for housing, food, childcare, health care, and education. Difficult choices must be made when limited resources cover only some of these necessities. Often it is housing, which absorbs a high proportion of income that must be dropped. If you are poor, you are essentially an illness, an accident, or a paycheck away from living on the streets.

In 2007, 12.5% of the U.S. population, or 37,300,00 million people, lived in poverty. The official poverty rate in 2007 was not statistically different than 2006 (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2007). Children are over-represented, composing 35.7% of people in poverty while only being 24.8% of the total population. 

Two factors help account for increasing poverty: eroding employment opportunities for large segments of the workforce and the declining value and availability of public assistance.

ERODING WORK OPPORTUNITIES

Reasons why homelessness persists include stagnant or falling incomes and less secure jobs which offer fewer benefits.

Low-wage workers have been particularly have been left behind as the disparity between rich and poor has mushroomed. To compound the problem, the real value of the minimum wage in 2004 was 26% less than in 1979 (The Economic Policy Institute, 2005). Factors contributing to wage declines include a steep drop in the number and bargaining power of unionized workers; erosion in the value of the minimum wage; a decline in manufacturing jobs and the corresponding expansion of lower-paying service-sector employment; globalization; and increased nonstandard work, such as temporary and part-time employment (Mishel, Bernstein, and Schmitt, 1999). To combat this, Congress has planned a gradual minimum wage increase, resulting in minimum wage raised to $9.50 by 2011.

Declining wages, in turn, have put housing out of reach for many workers: in every state, more than the minimum wage is required to afford a one- or two-bedroom apartment at Fair Market Rent. [1] A recent U.S. Conference of Mayors report stated that in every state more than the minimum-wage is required to afford a one or two-bedroom apartment at 30% of his or her income, which is the federal definition of affordable housing.  Unfortunately, for 12 million Americans, more then 50% of their salaries go towards renting or housing costs, resulting in sacrifices in other essential areas like health care and savings.

The connection between impoverished workers and homelessness can be seen in homeless shelters, many of which house significant numbers of full-time wage earners. In 2007, a survey performed by the U.S. Conference of Mayors found that 17.4% of homeless adults in families were employed while 13% of homeless single adults or unaccompanied youth were employed. In the 2008 report, eleven out of nineteen cities reported an increased in employed homeless people.

With unemployment rates remaining high, jobs are hard to find in the current economy. Even if people can find work, this does not automatically provide an escape from poverty.

DECLINE IN PUBLIC ASSISTANCE

The declining value and availability of public assistance is another source of increasing poverty and homelessness. Until its repeal in August 1996, the largest cash assistance program for poor families with children was the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (the federal welfare reform law) repealed the AFDC program and replaced it with a block grant program called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). In 2005, TANF helped a third of the children that AFDC helped reach above the 50% poverty line. Unfortunately, TANF has not been able to kept up with inflation. In 2006-2008, TANF case load has continued to decline while food stamp caseloads have increased

Moreover, extreme poverty is growing more common for children, especially those in female-headed and working families. This increase can be traced directly to the declining number of children lifted above one-half of the poverty line by government cash assistance for the poor (Children's Defense Fund and the National Coalition for the Homeless, 1998).

As a result of loss of benefits, low wages, and unstable employment, many families leaving welfare struggle to get medical care, food, and housing.

People with disabilities, too, must struggle to obtain and maintain stable housing. In 2006, on a national average, monthly rent for a one-bedroom apartment rose to $715 per month which is a 113.1% of a person’s on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) monthly income (Priced Out in 2006). For the first time, the national average rent for a studio apartment rose above the income of a person who relies only on SSI income. Recently, only nine percent of non-institutionalized people receiving SSI receive housing assistance (Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities, 2005).

Most states have not replaced the old welfare system with an alternative that enables families and individuals to obtain above-poverty employment and to sustain themselves when work is not available or possible.

HOUSING

A lack of affordable housing and the limited scale of housing assistance programs have contributed to the current housing crisis and to homelessness.

According to HUD, in recent years the shortages of affordable housing are most severe for units affordable to renters with extremely low incomes.  Federal support for low-income housing has fallen 49% from 1980 to 2003 (National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2005). About 200,000 rental housing units are destroyed annually. Renting is one of the most viable options for low income people (Joint Center for Housing Studies).

Since 2000, the incomes of low-income households has declined as rents continue to rise (National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2005).  In 2009, a worker would need to earn $14.97 to afford a one-bedroom apartment and $17.84 to afford a two-bedroom apartment. There has been an increase of 41% from 2000 to 2009 in fair market rent for a two-bedroom unit, according to HUD (National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2009).

The lack of affordable housing has lead to high rent burdens (rents which absorb a high proportion of income), overcrowding, and substandard housing. These phenomena, in turn, have not only forced many people to become homeless; they have put a large and growing number of people at risk of becoming homeless.

Housing assistance can make the difference between stable housing, precarious housing, or no housing at all. However, the demand for assisted housing clearly exceeds the supply: only about one-third of poor renter households receive a housing subsidy from the federal, state, or a local government (Daskal, 1998). The limited level of housing assistance means that most poor families and individuals seeking housing assistance are placed on long waiting lists.  Today the average wait for Section 8 Vouchers is 35 months (U.S. Conference of Mayors, 2004).

Excessive waiting lists for public housing mean that people must remain in shelters or inadequate housing arrangements longer. In a survey of 24 cities, people remain homeless an average of seven months, and 87% of cities reported that the length of time people are homeless has increased in recent years (U.S. Conference of Mayors, 2005).  Longer stays in homeless shelters result in less shelter space available for other homeless people, who must find shelter elsewhere or live on the streets. In 2007, it was found that average stay in homeless shelters for households with children was 5.7 months, while this number is only slightly smaller for singles and unaccompanied children at 4.7 months. (The U.S. Conference for Mayors, 2007).

In 2003, the federal government spent almost twice as much in housing-related tax expenditures and direct housing assistance for households in the top income quintile than on housing subsidies for the lowest-income households (National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2005).  Thus, federal housing policy has not responded to the needs of low-income households, while disproportionately benefiting the wealthiest Americans.

OTHER FACTORS

Particularly within the context of poverty and the lack of affordable housing, certain additional factors may push people into homelessness. Other major factors, which can contribute to homelessness, include the following:

Lack of Affordable Health Care: For families and individuals struggling to pay the rent, a serious illness or disability can start a downward spiral into homelessness, beginning with a lost job, depletion of savings to pay for care, and eventual eviction. One in three Americans, or 86.7 million people, is uninsured. Of those uninsured, 30.7% are under eighteen. In 2007-2008, four out of five people that were uninsured were working families. Work-based health insurance has become rarer in recent years, especially for workers in the agricultural or service sectors (Families USA, 2009).

Domestic Violence: Battered women who live in poverty are often forced to choose between abusive relationships and homelessness.  In addition, 50% of the cities surveyed by the U.S. Conference of Mayors identified domestic violence as a primary cause of homelessness (U.S. Conference of Mayors, 2005). Approximately 63% of homeless women have experienced domestic violence in their adult lives (Network to End Domestic Violence).

Mental Illness: Approximately 16% of the single adult homeless population suffers from some form of severe and persistent mental illness (U.S. Conference of Mayors, 2005). Despite the disproportionate number of severely mentally ill people among the homeless population, increases in homelessness are not attributable to the release of severely mentally ill people from institutions. Most patients were released from mental hospitals in the 1950s and 1960s, yet vast increases in homelessness did not occur until the 1980s, when incomes and housing options for those living on the margins began to diminish rapidly. According to the 2003 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Report, most homeless persons with mental illness do not need to be institutionalized, but can live in the community with the appropriate supportive housing options (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2003). However, many mentally ill homeless people are unable to obtain access to supportive housing and/or other treatment services. The mental health support services most needed include case management, housing, and treatment.

Addiction Disorders: The relationship between addiction and homelessness is complex and controversial. While rates of alcohol and drug abuse are disproportionately high among the homeless population, the increase in homelessness over the past two decades cannot be explained by addiction alone. Many people who are addicted to alcohol and drugs never become homeless, but people who are poor and addicted are clearly at increased risk of homelessness. Addiction does increase the risk of displacement for the precariously housed; in the absence of appropriate treatment, it may doom one's chances of getting housing once on the streets. Homeless people often face insurmountable barriers to obtaining health care, including addictive disorder treatment services and recovery supports.

CONCLUSION

Homelessness results from a complex set of circumstances that require people to choose between food, shelter, and other basic needs. Only a concerted effort to ensure jobs that pay a living wage, adequate support for those who cannot work, affordable housing, and access to health care will bring an end to homelessness." http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/index.html

Think of the cost of living now, in 2018. Wages stay about the same while the cost of living continues to climb each year. Think about even what a gallon of milk was five years ago vs now. I won't get into the wages debate here because there's soooo much to cover on that BUT I will say that simply just increasing wages won't work long term at all. Costs will just keep going higher and high, profits on major sellers of goods will go up and up yet wages won't nor will the cost of living get more reasonable to wages. However, this will show how the wages are not keeping up. Yet this was 2015, not today.

source

So...... now that you have seen the numbers and the facts, have you or someone you have known been homeless, even for a short time? How do you feel about those numbers? Has any of it changed your mind on how you view the homeless and destitute? Even those who panhandle, legit need or not?

Keep reading....

Most homeless walk among us with their heads down and try to be as unobtrusive as they can possibly be. They do self-segregate as much as possible, but being human also means seeing humanity at work and play. It's time many of us recognize that the immediacy of need or treatment is what tumbles most into an abyss that is hard to get out of. In a crisis, the only solution is immediate cash, which is basically asking for the near impossible.

There are legitimate stories by the thousands.... For every one that doesn't want help, there are many more who do. Yet we judge them and treat them worse than we treat a lost dog on the street!

There's also limited beds in these "Homeless facilities" so maybe more is needed. Also showing them that they won't be judged. Many are ashamed of where they are. Asking for help, being seen at shelters and things like that, just makes them feel worse. Many fear the violence and theft that occur at shelters as well. Especially those with children.


So often all I hear society say about the poor, destitute, homeless, disabled and or families with any government assistance is something like this:

"At this festive season of the year, Mr Scrooge, ... it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir."
"Are there no prisons?"
"Plenty of prisons..."
"And the Union workhouses." demanded Scrooge. "Are they still in operation?"
"Both very busy, sir..."
"Those who are badly off must go there."
"Many can't go there; and many would rather die."
"If they would rather die," said Scrooge, "they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population."

Like here in the Fort Smith area, check this out. From a friend: "When someone loses everything they have worked for, their fault or not, that brings about huge mental changes. Depression, anxiety, guilt, feelings of self doubt and worthlessness... Telling someone to do something is totally different than showing someone they are capable of restoring their life. Also, I was told the (A local place that helps the homeless) doesn't accept children and DHS will be called to remove the child(ren). I'm not sure of the legitimacy of that, but I would think that would keep many away from there for fear of losing their child/children."

So just punish them more for being homeless.... Yet statistics showed that only 16% of those homeless are directly due to moderate to severe mental illness.

Yet instead of helping those in need, many would rather give tax cuts to the wealthy and to hell with anyone in need.... Many don’t give a crap about them, or where they go, just as long as you don’t have to look at them... Not all who are homeless "deserve it" "are too lazy" or "asked for it" so think on that. Many do struggle with mental illness, so what about helping them through that? What about the kids who are homeless? The teenage girl who is prostituting herself homeless because she left an abusive father and thought she could make it on her own? What about the boy who ran away from the foster home he was at because the foster mother despised him like the rest of his own family did? What about the homeless family who have been on the streets a week because the father got laid off work due to the economy and they lost their home because the landlord kicked them out? What about the homeless veterans? They served this country and this is how we give back to them?

Let's look more into just the youth and children aspect.

Children Living in Homeless Families

"More than 1.5 million children live in families without a home. Among those, 42 percent are under the age of 6. African-American children disproportionately experience homelessness (47%), and children of American Indian and Alaska Native backgrounds have a slightly higher proportion of homelessness (2%), compared with their representation in the population. Homeless families are more likely to be led by a single-mother in her twenties with young children.

Unaccompanied Youth

An estimated 1.6 to 1.7 million youth join the ranks of runaways and homeless each year. The group identified as unaccompanied youth can be categorized into sub-groups:

    runaway-homeless youths, who stayed away at least overnight without parents’ or guardians’ permission;
    so-called ‘throwaway’ youths-who left home because parents encouraged them to leave or locked them out of the home;
    independent youths who feel that they have no home to return to due to irreconcilable familial conflicts or have lost contact with their families.

Females are larger in number among runaway-homeless and independent youths, and African- American and Native American youth tend to be over-represented among all three types of unaccompanied youth. Further, between 20 and 40 percent of all homeless youth identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT).

Factors that Contribute to Homelessness

Homelessness represents deprivations from basic human needs. However, while other types of deprivations, such as hunger, mainly occur as a result of poverty and economic insecurity, factors that contribute to homelessness are multi-faceted; the factors also vary by the type of homelessness experienced by children and youth. These factors include lack of affordable housing, economic insecurity, violence at home, behavioral health, lack of social support, and involvement in the child welfare system.

Did you know?

According to the 2007 Hunger and Homeless Survey conducted by the United States Conference of Mayors, 15 the top three contributing factors for homelessness are:

Among children living in homeless families:

    lack of affordable housing
    poverty
    domestic violence

Among unaccompanied youth:

    mental illness
    substance abuse
    lack of affordable housing"

Let's go more into this one.

Now, this site has much more information for you but let's break it down here. The main causes are:

1. Lack of Affordable Housing - Overall the number of households with children reporting “severe” housing problems has increased from eight percent in 1978 to 13.8 percent in 2005

2. Economic Insecurity - In 2005, more than 60 percent of families with income less than 30 percent of the HUD-adjusted area median family income were paying more than half of their income for rent, and about the same proportion of families were also living in severely inadequate housing.

3. Violence at Home - Among homeless mothers with children, more than 80 percent previously experienced domestic violence. Unaccompanied youth often have prior experiences of violence, either witnessing violence or being abused physically or sexually. More youth in runaway and homeless programs report fights and physical or emotional abuse from their family members, compared with those without such experiences.  The majority of youth in runaway and homeless youth programs report their biological mothers as a main perpetrator of maltreatment.

4. Behavioral Health -  Higher risks of exposure to violence or trauma can contribute to behavioral health problems among homeless children and youth. Unaccompanied youth are more likely to be depressed and to have mental health or substance abuse problems compared with housed youth. While runaway and homeless experiences influence mental health status, youth who experience homelessness exhibit more behavioral problems prior to their runaway or homeless experiences compared with youth without runaway or homeless episodes

5. Lack of Positive Social Support - Homeless families with children and unaccompanied youth tend to have weak or unstable social supports. Some research shows that they have fewer social networks and less social support. Unaccompanied youth are more likely to report family problems. Further, they tend to report their friends as a source of support more frequently than their own parents and try to substitute street networks for their failed family networks.

6. Involvement in the Child Welfare System - Youth in foster care are at higher risk of homelessness. Forty nine percent of youth in foster care report a history of running away from home. Previous research indicates between 14 and 50 percent of foster youth experienced homelessness

So, let's add in JUST the mental health part since many say those who are homeless also have mental health problems, yet we wonder why.  Continued from the same source.

Mental Health and Exposure to Violence or Trauma

Children living in homeless families and unaccompanied youth also have a greater risk of experiencing mental health problems, compared with their housed peers. It has been reported that young children with homeless experiences had more behavioral problems based on the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) than housed children. A study on school-aged children of homeless families reported that a higher proportion of homeless children experienced mental disorders with impairment, such as disruptive behavior disorders, social phobia, and major depression, as compared to their low-income housed counterparts.

While homeless children and youth are more likely to witness or experience violence prior to homeless episodes, they are also exposed to violence due to the public nature of their lives and vulnerable living conditions associated with poverty, such as being on the streets, in shelters, doubling up with others, or crowded housing. Unaccompanied youth are also more vulnerable to physical or sexual victimization. More than one-third of the adolescents met lifetime criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Among those adolescents, an estimated 45 percent of PTSD males and 28 percent of females experienced assault with a weapon; 42 percent of female runaways experienced sexual assault. LGBT homeless youth have an even higher likelihood of being victimized on the streets, compared with their heterosexual counterparts (59% vs. 33%). Nearly one in five homeless youth attempted suicide, and more than half of heterosexual homeless youth had suicidal thoughts while about three-fourths of LGBT youth have had such thoughts. The majority of homeless youth on the streets use substances such as tobacco (81%), alcohol (80%), or marijuana (75%), while those in shelters had slightly lower substance use (52%, 67% and 71% respectively).

That's just a drop in the bucket.

"Love your neighbor" yet those turning their snubbery noses up on this are the ones to "pity" those overseas and send money to them. Oh wait, that's because they don't have to see what's going on in Syria or wherever, whereas here it's in your face and you don't want to deal with something that "isn't your problem" or "The homeless brought it on themselves!" So, all the homeless brought it on themselves? Only they can get themselves out of it? They are scum of the Earth and deserve nothing, not even compassion? Is that how some of you truly feel? Are all who seek help, panhandling or not, leeches? Lazy?

What good is it to say you are saved and trying to show others Christ if you don't do it? If you don't "Love your neighbor" or to go after that one sheep that nobody else will?

The next homeless person may be you. Do you want your friends and family to think the same of you as many already do the homeless?

Wake up!
All of you who condemn these people...

Someday those who judge could be homeless, will they want the same treatment they approve of now? Maybe the leaders will be the first to wake up. Likely not....... I pray they wake up though, that many who read this will wake up.

Go look at all the money you have. Your home equity, 401k, cash, etc etc etc. Now realize most of you are about 2 months away from homelessness. Seriously! Especially those who want to live like the Jones's. Look rich but be dirt poor with a lot of debt, and more. Most people are two house payments away from being in foreclosure and homeless. Under federal law, in most cases, a servicer can’t start a foreclosure until a homeowner is more than 120 days overdue on payments. BUT once you are late on even ONE, the late fees and more can really add up, so that starts a bad spiral down, especially if other unexpected bills came up and you just can't get your head back up from underwater. Is that always the fault of the person? NO!

Go see for yourself for a few days what it's like. I've volunteered to help feed the homeless before. It has always been a good lesson for my oldest to see how good she really has it, even though she doesn't have nearly as much as many local kids do, she at least has what she NEEDS. That's more than what the homeless have. I have read and heard of soooo many kids who live and or lived on the streets. Some of the books I have read were more a collection of stories comprised into a book. I used to own several years ago. It's sad.... The stories from the kids I have worked for in the past both in juvenile corrections and in a children's shelter would make you cry. Yet those same ones who cry, would tell them as soon as they are 18 and get booted from the system that their poverty, their homelessness is all their fault and to hell with them. Think I'm joking? I've seen it happen first hand. I've heard from some of those kids myself what happened once they hit 18. What, many already do for those already homeless, why not the kids who age out too? Too cruel? Well, so is your outlook on those impoverished now. Age, race, social status, all of it doesn't matter. Yet who helps them? Who helps the homeless? Who truly helps those who need it get out of that despair and get back on their feet? Do you even care if they can eventually come back to where they perhaps once were, on their feet making an impact in society.

Yet then why do we also look down on the adults working fast food or convenience stores making minimum wage, college educated or not? At least they have a job right? At least they are trying to survive. Oh, it's not good enough? What is good enough then? You saw the numbers already, what is good enough? You? As if......

Words a friend shared a little over a year ago still stick with me. "The inconvenient reality of compassion: While discussing James 2 this morning in life group, the issue of poverty and "the poor" came up. There was some comparison of the poor here to the poor around the world, and the assertion that many American poor are that way, to some extent, by their own choosing, or purposely as a way to "game the system" (is that a phrase?). It's hard to want to help and show compassion to people who put themselves in a position of need. But if we're going to claim Christianity, and show the love of Christ to the world, then their needs and what we can do to help should be the only two points of interest. How they got where they are, or their attitude towards our help, or their willingness to change their ways don't matter. The love of Jesus is unconditional towards us. We didn't earn what He freely gave us, we often don't show gratitude for our salvation, and we chose, and continue to choose actions (sin) which require Help that we can't provide for ourselves. It's a good thing that when God looks down at us, living our lives marred by sin, and disgusting compared to His holiness, that He doesn't roll His eyes and shake His head, like we're some bum with a cardboard sign. Because we are all about as worthy of Salvation as the bum on the side of the road is entitled to my help. That's Christianity; helping BECAUSE it's needed, and not worrying about WHY it's needed. And that is a very inconvenient idea, especially in our Americanized church" B went on to say in the comments, "I do think the church should be a place and group that transcends the effects of social class, but unfortunately, often you still find the "us" and "them" cliques"


James 2:1-9 says:

"My brothers and sisters, do not show prejudice if you possess faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ. For if someone comes into your assembly wearing a gold ring and fine clothing, and a poor person enters in filthy clothes, do you pay attention to the one who is finely dressed and say, “You sit here in a good place,” and to the poor person, “You stand over there,” or “Sit on the floor”?

If so, have you not made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil motives?

Listen, my dear brothers and sisters! Did not God choose the poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom that he promised to those who love him? But you have dishonored the poor! Are not the rich oppressing you and dragging you into the courts? Do they not blaspheme the good name of the one you belong to? But if you fulfill the royal law as expressed in this scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well. But if you show prejudice, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as violators."

I wonder if we put so much focus on prayer and action that instead of popularity contests, this would really would be a better place if we quit putting social or economic status on people.

So what can we really do then? We can be a rainbow for them in the storm. Self inflicted storm or not.

So, this old pic that's gone around before on Facebook, will we really do that? I need to get better at it too. These coming words are for myself too. We say we would do stuff like this for our friends and family but do we? Do we really? Do we stay there for them when life is good but flee when we don't like something they said or their storm continues raging on and on and on? What about strangers? So maybe not have them meet at your house but what about at McDonald's for coffee? What about taking food to them? What about offering to take a cab and pay for that and a hair cut? You know what difference that would make in how they feel about themselves? Clean hair and or a clean shave? Many of you I'm sure have seen videos like that on Facebook or on the news. What about us doing something like that? Even once a month, doing something for someone who we can see is struggling.

But why don't we? Even if we have a few extra bucks, why don't we? Why don't we even do something for free and that is be kind? Give them five minutes to share how their day is going, homeless or not? "The homeless smell bad" well do something to help them with that. Ignore the smell for just a few minutes, if nothing else. If you can handle the nasty smell of a skunk stench in your car for five minutes driving, you can be nice for five minutes to someone who needs it.


Those in this world who were commanded to love like Christ, often love the least. Why? This is not who we are called to be..... Do I agree with the lifestyles sometimes? NO! Does that mean they are less than me? NO!! What were we taught? Love like Christ loved.

That simple!

“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”
― Emma Lazarus


What happened to this? Now I'm not saying that everyone should just have free reign. However banning people, shutting them out, removing public benches, blaming all for the actions of a few, hatred, racism, etc. There isn't excuses for that...  How we treat many, including the homeless is not what Emma had in mind.... Nor did God.



Matthew 25:35-40
For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

James 1:17
Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.

1 John 3:17
But if anyone has the world’s goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God’s love abide in him?

Romans 12:13
Contribute to the needs of the saints and seek to show hospitality.

Galatians 6:2
Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.

Philippians 2:4
Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.

Acts 20:35
In everything I showed you that by working hard in this manner you must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He Himself said, ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’

Shall I say more?

Ephesians 2:19-22
Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and also members of his household,
And in him you too are being built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit.


If people around you refuse to help themselves, we are commanded to love them anyway. However we are NOT commanded to enable their behavior or to act fools. We are not to tell them when they come to you upset that they are idiots and they asked for whatever. Even if they did, you show them love and compassion without enabling or encouraging the negative behavior.

Think about this though, what colors are you painting yourself and the world around you? What colors are you throwing onto others without even knowing them or their story, or simply what their day is like? What brought them to where they currently are? They didn't become that overnight. Before throwing them under the bus, listen to their story, show compassion, look at life from their perspective.

We whine and complain about how the world sees us as Christians, maybe it's time that instead of whining, we show action. We show what Christ really commanded of us. THEN maybe the world will judge us a little less. Besides, we aren't supposed to live as if we love what is in this world anyway, we should live for what comes after.

Maybe if those who said they followed Jesus had loved me the way they should have, I wonder if my darkest point would have happened...... Yet because of that story, I know I have helped others, and maybe, just maybe that's when the healing really started. I knew my pain had a purpose when I knew my story had shown others that they are not alone in a world that has no qualms about making them feel as if they are.

What beauty dwells in the heart of those tortured, 

That feel love so deep but hatred stains. 

Sadness upon there brow. 

Theses tortured once bright. 

Will almost never return to the light.

What will you do? What light will you bring into their dark and sad world? Be a rainbow in their storm, even just once because you may be the only one who ever is.


~ Special Momma ~